BIASES IN THE CRETACEOUS-PALEOGENE POSTCRANIAL RECORD OF MAMMALS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERPRETING PALEOECOLOGY
I visited 37 localities that have historically produced more than one postcranial element. I collected surface and in situ microvertebrate material, and described the stratigraphy and sedimentology, when possible. I combined this data with field notes and published descriptions, resulting in lithology and depositional environment designations for each locality. Results suggest postcranial elements are overwhelmingly found in sandstone and channel deposits, and are often associated with mud “rip-up” clasts and organics. Even excluding the time-averaged and re-worked Bug Creek Anthill Assemblages (a rich sandstone channel deposit), proportionally more postcrania are found in sandstone and channel deposits in the Paleogene than the Cretaceous. Indicative of large river systems, sandstone channel deposits are more common in the Paleogene, as are larger assemblages per locality. Excluding the three largest Paleogene channels from this analysis still preserves the preponderance of sandstone productive horizons compared to siltstone and mudstone deposits. Remaining postcrania are more abundant in Cretaceous mudstones than siltstones, a pattern that is reversed for Paleogene postcrania.