WATER SOURCES FOR SPRINGS IN SAGEHEN BASIN, SIERRA NEVADA RANGE, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINED BY CHEMICAL, ISOTOPIC, AND PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
Sagehen springwater δ18O is correlated to the degree of spring discharge variation (R2 = 0.64). A possible control on discharge variation is the flow system supplying water to the spring. Springs sourced from a deep, long-path flow system could be less susceptible to discharge variation than springs sourced from a shallow, short-path flow system. This scenario is supported by discharge variation’s inverse correlation with both springwater age (R2 = 0.51) and alkalinity (R2 = 0.62), showing that springs with low discharge variation discharge older waters that have had more time to weather minerals in the subsurface; temperature data also suggest deeper circulation depths for low-discharge-variation spring waters. The link between δ18O and discharge variation could be present because the large volumes of water needed to develop high heads to push recharge into deep flow systems may only be available during snowmelt, which is isotopically distinct from warm-season precipitation.
A weak inverse correlation (R2 = 0.45) exists between δ18O range and mean δ18O value for a spring. Because light waters tend to discharge from springs with low discharge variations, an explanation for this relationship is that low-discharge-variation springs discharge a mixture of water from both deep and shallow flow systems. As the deep/shallow source ratio varies, the range in isotopic composition would increase; in contrast, high-discharge variation springs may only discharge water from shallow flow systems, minimizing the isotopic variation.
Sagehen spring waters appear to have their isotopic signatures influenced by mixing between waters from deep flow systems recharged by snowmelt and shallow flow systems recharged by both cool- and warm-season precipitation.