|Rocky Mountain Section - 64th Annual Meeting (9–11 May 2012)|
|Paper No. 31-1|
|Presentation Time: 8:30 AM-8:45 AM|
CRATERS OF THE SOUTHWEST BOTH YOUNG AND OLD, SMALL AND LARGE: METEOR CRATER, AZ AND SANTA FE, NM
WRIGHT, Shawn, Department of Geology and Geography, Auburn University, 210 Petrie Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, email@example.com, NEWSOM, Horton, Institute of Meteoritics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, and MCELVAIN, T., Santa Fe, NM 87505|
With the paucity of impact sites on Earth compared to planets with older surfaces, the field geologist is not able to view impact breccias, ejecta outcrops, and central peaks. The southwestern United States has two impact sites in Meteor Crater and Santa Fe where these features can be examined. The two craters differing remarkably in nearly every aspect (Table 1) provides a variety of features and geologic histories.
Meteor Crater is well-studied over the past century (guidebook: Kring 2007). To generate interest in a 1-day field trip to Santa Fe on Saturday, May 12th, current knowledge of the Santa Fe impact structure is presented here.
Shatter cones were observed in 2006 (McElvain et al. 2007) and verified by petrography (Fackelman et al. 2008). Impact models suggest that shatter cones form directly under the transient crater (Baratoux & Melosh 2003). The orientation of Santa Fe shatter cones (Fackelman) combined with the pattern of float and proposed vertical erosion (> 2 km) lead us to suggest that a large outcrop of shatter cones may be under the central peak of the original crater.
Breccias are found ~18 km ESE of the shatter cones, but these breccias are associated with fault breccias outlining the Picuris-Pecos Fault. There is much debate about the timing and potential reactivation(s) of this fault (Bauer & Rasler 1995; Fankhauser & Erslev 2004; Cather et al. 2007), but these fault breccias in Proterozoic metagranites and schists provide excellent comparisons to a 2nd breccia found in several localities to the west of the shatter cones. This Breccia Type 2 (Wright et al. 2010) are also clasts in the proposed fault breccias, which indicates several brecciation events took place. No glass is observable 100’s of Ma after impact, and the matrix of Breccia Type #2 has been replaced by hematite and silica due to aqueous alteration. Petrography and SEM images of shatter cones and breccias, along with field images, will be shown along with those from other terrestrial impact sites for comparison.
Rocky Mountain Section - 64th Annual Meeting (9–11 May 2012)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 31|
Meteorites and Impact Craters
Hotel Albuquerque: Alvarado H
8:30 AM-12:00 PM, Friday, 11 May 2012
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 44, No. 6, p. 88
© Copyright 2012 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.