Southeastern Section - 61st Annual Meeting (1–2 April 2012)

Paper No. 4
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM

EFFECTS OF WATERSHED LAND USE AND GEOMORPHOLOGY ON STREAM LOW FLOWS DURING SEVERE DROUGHT CONDITIONS IN THE SOUTHERN BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS, GEORGIA AND NORTH CAROLINA


PRICE, Katie1, JACKSON, C. Rhett2, PARKER, Albert J.3 and CYTERSKI, Mike1, (1)U.S. EPA, Ecosystems Research Division, 960 College Station Rd, Athens, GA 30601, (2)University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, GA 30602, (3)University of Georgia, Department of Geography, Athens, GA 30602, price.katie@epa.gov

Watershed land use and topographic variability influence stream low flows, yet their interactions and relative influence remain unresolved. Our objective was to assess the relative influences of land use and watershed geomorphic characteristics on low flow variability in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina and Georgia. Ten-minute interval discharge data for 35 streams (in watersheds from 3 to 146 km2) were measured for two late summer low flow seasons, coinciding with a severe drought period in the southeastern United States. Three low flow metrics were calculated (1-day and 7-day minimum flows, and 1-percentile flow) for each low flow season (August 5-November 12, 2007 and August 1 – November 12, 2008). A comprehensive suite of watershed characteristics, including factors of topography, channel network morphometry, soils, land use, and precipitation were used in multiple regression analysis of low flow variability among the 35 watersheds. Additionally, low flows in groups of lower- and higher-forest cover watersheds were compared. Drainage density, areal coverage of colluvium, topographic variability (as slope standard deviation), and percent of the channel network as first order stream emerged as the most important variables for explaining low flow variability. Watershed forest cover demonstrated a consistent, significant positive relationship with low flows, despite the higher evapotranspiration rates associated with forest compared with other land covers, and despite the relatively small range of disturbance in this study area. This highlights the importance of infiltration and recharge under undisturbed land cover in sustaining low flows, and bears noteworthy implications for environmental flows and water resource sustainability.