Paper No. 11
Presentation Time: 3:50 PM


EMERMAN, Steven H.1, NELSON, Janae R.1, CARLSON, J. Kade1, ANDERSON, Tracy Kemp1, SHARMA, Anusha2 and ADHIKARI, Basanta Raj3, (1)Department of Earth Science, Utah Valley University, 800 West University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, (2)Central Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal, (3)Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal,

Elevated levels of As in groundwater in the floodplain of the Ganges River have been well-documented over the past 15 years. Recent studies have shown that elevated groundwater As occurs even in Kathmandu and Pokhara Valleys in Nepal, two tectonic valleys well upstream of the floodplain of the Ganges River. Moreover, studies in both valleys showed surface water As to be statistically indistinguishable from groundwater As, which led to the fluvial recharge model in which elevated groundwater As results from losing streams with elevated As, which is a consequence of rapid erosion caused by a combination of monsoon climate, tectonic uplift and deforestation. The objective of this study was to further test the fluvial recharge model in Mustang Valley, the third major tectonic valley in Nepal Himalaya far upstream from the floodplain of the Ganges River. In May 2011 water samples were collected from 33 surface water sites (24 directly from streams and 9 from canals, pipes or taps fed by streams) and 24 groundwater sites (10 directly from springs and 14 from pipes or taps fed by springs). No wells were found anywhere in Mustang Valley. The WHO As Standard (As = 0.01 mg/L) was exceeded in 47% of surface water samples and 79% of groundwater samples, including all nine functioning water taps in Lo-Manthang, the largest village. Separating samples into a high-As Region I (37 sites with geometric mean As = 0.071 mg/L and maximum As = 0.848 mg/L) and a low-As Region II (20 sites with undetectable As for 85% of samples and maximum As = 0.004 mg/L) showed that surface water As (geometric mean As = 0.056 mg/L in Region I) and groundwater As (geometric mean As = 0.087 mg/L in Region I) were statistically indistinguishable within each region. Only Region I receives overland flow from the exposed Mustang and Mugu Granites. The correspondence between groundwater As and watershed surface lithology is further evidence for the fluvial recharge model. Region I was also elevated with respect to Region II in Fe, Cu, Zn, Co and pH for both groundwater and surface water. Groundwater As was uncorrelated with Fe (R2 = 0.19), Mn (R2 = 3 × 10-6), sulfate (R2 = 0.05), any combination of the transition elements (R2 < 0.24), or pH (R2 = 0.20), which is inconsistent with the competing reductive-dissolution, sulfide-oxidation and pH desorption models.
  • Emerman_GSA_2013.pptx (8.1 MB)