POPHAM BEACH, MAINE: AN EXAMPLE OF ENGINEERING ACTIVITY THAT SAVED BEACH PROPERTY WITHOUT HARMING THE BEACH

Beach and property erosion on coasts is a widespread and chronic problem. Historical approaches to this issue, including seawalls and sand replenishment, are often inappropriate or too expensive. In Maine, seawalls were banned in 1983 and replenishment is too costly to employ. Replacement of storm-damaged buildings is also not allowed, and a precedent case on Popham Beach, Maine required that the owner remove an unpermitted building from a site where an earlier structure was damaged. When Maine’s most popular park, Popham Beach State Park, experienced inlet-associated erosion that threatened park infrastructure (a bathhouse), temporary measures were all that the law allowed. Since it was clear that the inlet channel causing the erosion would eventually change course, the state opted to erect a temporary seawall with fallen trees at the site. This may or may not have slowed the erosion temporarily, but reassured the public that “something was being done”. Once a storm cut a new tidal inlet channel and closed off the old one, tidal water still entered the former channel and continued to threaten the bathhouse. To ultimately save the property, beach scraping was employed. Sand was scraped from the lower beach to construct a sand berm that deflected the tidal current away from the endangered property. This action created enough time for natural processes to drive the remains of the former spit onto the beach and widen it significantly. While there are many examples of engineering practices that endanger instead of saving beaches, this example is one of an appropriate engineering effort to rescue unwisely located beach-front property.