ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER FLOODING USING WATER CHEMISTRY AND GEOCHEMICAL MODELING, WAWARSING, NEW YORK
Water samples from bedrock wells in the study area generally had higher concentrations of SO42- and Cl- and lower concentrations of Ca, HCO3-, and CO32- compared to samples from most wells screened in the unconsolidated aquifer and from springs. Differences in calcite and gypsum saturation indexes were evident in water samples among (1) most bedrock wells and wells screened in the unconsolidated aquifer, and (2) water samples collected from two bedrock wells before and during a tunnel shutdown. Stable-isotope ratios among δ18O, δD, δ34S of SO42-, and 87Sr/86Sr were used to help distinguish water in the tunnel from native groundwater. Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr ratios, for example, are distinctly different among samples from most bedrock wells and samples from tunnel water. Age-tracer data for chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) provided some useful information about pathways of the groundwater-flow system, but were limited by inherent problems with dissolved gas data from bedrock wells caused by excess air and degassing from high concentrations of H2S and CH4. Water chemistry data and mixing models were used together with hydrogeologic data to assess the relative contribution of tunnel water and native groundwater to local groundwater and springs related to flooding.