South-Central Section - 47th Annual Meeting (4-5 April 2013)

Paper No. 1-3
Presentation Time: 8:40 AM

MAKING GEOLOGISTS OUT OF ENGINEERS: INTEGRATING TEXAS SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY FROM THE BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY’S AUSTIN CORE RESEARCH CENTER INTO A CLASSROOM DESIGN MODULE FOR PETROLEUM ENGINEERING STUDENTS


OLSON, Hilary Clement1, BRYANT, Steve2, OLSON, Jon E.3 and WILLIAMS, Iona2, (1)Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd., Bldg. 196, Austin, TX 78758, (2)Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 200 E. Dean Keeton St., Stop C0300, Austin, TX 78712, (3)Dept. of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 200 E. Dean Keeton St., Stop C0300, Austin, TX 78712, holson@austin.utexas.edu

In 2009, we initiated a program funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to increase workforce capacity for the geological carbon storage industry. One of our completed deliverables is the development and utilization of inquiry-based geological carbon storage teaching materials, specifically a classroom design module entitled CO2 Injection for Geological Storage (Olson et al., 2013). Here, we discuss the application of this module in educating and training petroleum engineering undergraduate and graduate students, to make them more aware of the geological aspects of designing a geological carbon storage project.

Students are asked to design a local storage project for an actual coal-fired power plant, the Fayette Power Project. The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) relies heavily on the Fayette Power Project to offer electricity for Central Texas consumers. The facility is located on a 10-square-mile site seven miles east of La Grange, Texas.

Students are instructed to use a local geologic formation, the Wilcox, as the target injection formation. Wilcox core is available to integrate into the design project from the Mobil Lake Creek Unit No. 48 well, in nearby Montgomery County, archived at the Bureau of Economic Geology’s Austin Core Research Center. As part of their work, students can use graphical core analysis and petrophysical data (Guevara and Grigsby, 1992) provided in the Bureau of Economic Geology’s Geological Circular 92-L. Or, as we have done in several instances, students can increase their geological knowledge by interpreting the depositional environments as delta-front facies, delta-plain facies, or shelf/bay/prodelta mud-rich facies from the actual core, then select the best unit for storage.

Once the target is chosen, CO2 phase behavior is evaluated for target-depth temperature and pressure. Storage requirements and achievable injection rates are then calculated by students to assess the pore space requirements and surface land footprint for the storage project. Societal and environmental impact issues are also examined through demonstrations and calculations related to seal integrity and capillary trapping (Olson et al., 2013).