2014 GSA Annual Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia (19–22 October 2014)

Paper No. 36-1
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM

BIKE HELMETS AND BLACK RIDERS:  EXPERIENTIAL APPROACHES TO HELPING STUDENTS UNDERSTAND NATURAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION ISSUES


STEIN, Seth1, KLEY, Jonas2, HINDLE, David2 and FRIEDRICH, Anke3, (1)Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3130, (2)Geoscience Center, University of Goettingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, Goettingen, 37077, Germany, (3)Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, GSA International Section, Munich, Germany

Defending society against natural hazards is a high-stakes game of chance against nature, involving tough decisions. How should a developing nation allocate its budget between building schools for towns without ones or making existing schools earthquake-resistant? Does it make more sense to build levees to protect against floods, or to prevent development in the areas at risk? Would more lives be saved by making hospitals earthquake-resistant, or using the funds for patient care? These topics are challenging because they are far from normal experience, in that they involve rare events and large sums. To help students in natural hazard classes conceptualize them, we pose tough and thought-provoking questions about complex issues involved and explore them together via lectures, videos, field trips, and in-class and homework questions. We discuss analogous examples from the students’ experiences, drawing on a new book “Playing Against Nature, Integrating Science and Economics to Mitigate Natural Hazards in an Uncertain World”. Asking whether they wear bicycle helmets and why or why not shows the cultural perception of risk. Individual students’ responses vary, and the overall results vary dramatically between the US, UK, and Germany. Challenges in hazard assessment in an uncertain world are illustrated by asking German students whether they buy a ticket on public transportation – accepting a known cost - or “ride black” - not paying but risking a heavy fine if caught. We explore the challenge of balancing mitigation costs and benefits via the question “If you were a student in Los Angeles, how much more would you pay in rent each month to live in an earthquake-safe building?”Students learn that interdisciplinary thinking is needed, and that due to both uncertainties and sociocultural factors, no unique or right strategies exist for a particular community, much the less all communities. However, we can seek robust policies that give sensible results given uncertaintie