2014 GSA Annual Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia (19–22 October 2014)

Paper No. 241-10
Presentation Time: 3:45 PM

RE-EVALUATING THE TEPHROCHRONOLOGY OF THE PALOUSE LOESS, WASHINGTON STATE, USING SINGLE-SHARD MAJOR- AND TRACE-ELEMENT ANALYSES


KING, Georgina E.1, PEARCE, Nicholas J.G.2, ROBERTS, Helen M.2, GAYLORD, David R.3, SWEENEY, Mark R.4 and SMITH, Victoria C.5, (1)Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland, (2)Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Llandinam Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, United Kingdom, (3)School of the Environment, Washington State University, PO Box 642812, Pullman, WA 99164-2812, (4)Earth Sciences Department, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, (5)Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY

Tephra derived from Mount St Helens (MSH) have played an important role in developing a chronostratigraphic framework for the Palouse Loess region, Washington State, USA. New analyses of both proximal and distal tephra units from Washington State using EPMA major-element and LA-ICP-MS trace-element geochemistry have been undertaken. These analyses reveal that MSH tephra commonly employed to constrain the timing of loess deposition, including tephra from MSH eruptive sets S (~16 ka) and M (~22 ka), cannot be differentiated using major-element chemistry alone. Further, some distal tephra in the Palouse Loess which were previously assigned as MSH Set S on the basis of major-element geochemistry or stratigraphic position are now suggested to be other tephra, including MSH Set M, based on their trace element compositions.

Additional support for this re-evaluation of these Palouse Loess tephra units has been provided by newly generated luminescence ages for the loess that brackets the tephra units. This combination of major- plus trace-element geochemistry and luminescence chronology provides a coherent picture of the tephrochronology of the Palouse sites examined. More broadly, this work demonstrates the role of trace-element geochemistry in discriminating between tephra, and highlights the importance of combining both detailed geochemistry and geochronology in areas where tephra are geochemically indistinct.