2014 GSA Annual Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia (19–22 October 2014)

Paper No. 233-4
Presentation Time: 9:45 AM

A HIMALAYAN SUSPECT TERRANE


MARTIN, Aaron J., Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

The Himalayan upper and middle crust consists of two assemblages of mostly supracrustal and minor intrusive rocks. Most of Himalayan Assemblage A was deposited in the Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic, whereas Himalayan Assemblage B dominantly was deposited in the latest Neoproterozoic to earliest Cenozoic. Along most of its exposed length, Assemblage B meets the tripartite definition of a suspect terrane. It: (1) has a homogeneous internal history, (2) has a pre-Silurian history different than adjacent rock packages, and (3) is separated from adjacent rocks by major faults. Although recognition of a domain as suspect does not necessarily indicate long distance transport, regional tectonic relations suggest that a system of right-handed transcurrent faults might have emplaced Himalayan Assemblage B on the northern margin of India in the middle Paleozoic. Himalayan assemblages A and B may share lower to middle Paleozoic history in the eastern Himalaya, suggesting possible mid-Paleozoic transpressive collision there, unlike in the remainder of the Himalaya where transport may have been more purely transcurrent. If correct, this interpretation implies that Himalayan Assemblage B is a piece of Greater Arabian crust that formed in the late Neoproterozoic, adding to our estimates of the volume of new continental crust produced in this region in the late Neoproterozoic.