2014 GSA Annual Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia (19–22 October 2014)

Paper No. 86-12
Presentation Time: 10:30 AM

EXPERIMENTAL MODELING OF THE CONTROLS OF SHAPES AND FLOW RATES OF SALT DIAPIRS


KARAM, Pierre, School of Geology & Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd St, Suite 710, Norman, OK 73019 and MITRA, Shankar, ConocoPhillips School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 E Boyd St, SEC 810, Norman, OK 73019

Analog modeling of salt diapirs was conducted using garnet and silica sand to simulate sediments and silicone gel to simulate salt to understand the controls of diapirs shapes and flow rates. Results show that the key factors are the rate of sedimentation, the sediment load, which is dependent on the column height and the sediment density, and the thickness of the salt layer. Sedimentation rate plays a dual role in the movement of salt. It provides the load, which is the main driving force for the salt movement, but can also restrain the movement of salt. Low rates of sedimentation result in the formation of a cylindrical diapir that eventually develops a flared shape, whereas a high rate of sedimentation results in eclipse and occlusion of the diapir after initial movement. Sediments with low density require a lower rate of sedimentation to compensate for the decreased load for the diapir to grow. Continued salt movement requires an optimum balance between the total load and the rate of sedimentation at all times. Variable rates of sedimentation result in changes in diapir shape over time. An initially slow rate may result in cylindrical and flared shapes of increasing diameter. An increase in the sedimentation rate may result in initial tapering followed by eclipse of the diapir, or continued movement after reduction in the diapir diameter. Tapering enables an increase in the salt velocity by decreasing its surface area. The thickness of the salt source controls both the rate of the salt flow and the dimensions of the diapir. A thick source layer results in a higher rate of flow, and also results in a wider diapir and flare, whereas a thin source layer results in a narrower diapir which flows at a lower rate and is eventually eclipsed. The results provide a guideline to better understand the evolutionary history of diapirs which can be used for analyzing natural structures.