DEVELOPING AN ACTUALISTIC STROMATOLITE FACIES MODEL: EXAMPLE FROM THE PALEOPROTEROZOIC
The use of the modern analog decreases with deep time. Archean-Mesoproterozoic stromatolites are finer grained and dominated by cement fabrics. Macrostructural forms are more varied and include branching columns and complex fascicles. Therefore, in order to develop a facies model that incorporates stromatolite form—from macro- down to the microstructural attributes—an actualistic approach is necessary.
We investigated a Paleoproterozoic stromatolite bed (Biwabik Iron Formation, MN) using cores and supplemented the data with field studies. The stratigraphy and local sedimentary structures support a shallow marine environment. However, unique attributes are not analogous to the common carbonate ramps and banks of the Phanerozoic. Stromatolites are associated with a bimodal sediment population of coated grains and allochthonous greenalite peloids. Sedimentary structures include meter-scale channels, gutter casts, flat-pebble conglomerate, and cross-bedded oolite. Unique features include complex breccia and poorly-sorted pisolite. Stromatolites are finely laminated and resemble geyserite. To develop an actualistic facies model, we created cm-scale lithofacies logs for 4 closely spaced cores (< 2 km apart). To predict vertical and lateral transitions between cores, we utilized reservoir modeling software (Petrel) to compare a deterministic facies model approach to a less biased stochastic method that honors proportions of lithofacies using statistical rules based on a pre-defined 3-D training image of a simple depositional setting. The stochastic method provided several competing resolutions that fit modern peritidal facies models and therefore challenge our simplistic view of marine settings.