A COMPARISON OF THE FLUVIAL SYSTEMS OF THE SALT WASH AND BRUSHY BASIN MEMBERS OF THE LATE JURASSIC MORRISON FORMATION
The study compares the fluvial architecture of the Salt Wash and Brushy Basin members of the Morrison Formation to better understand shifts in the fluvial systems and depositional environments through time. About 100 channels were mapped in each member. Fluvial deposits in both members are similar in several aspects, including lithology, paleofluvial parameters, and a NE paleoflow direction. Paleochannel fills consist of 0.3-4.8-m-thick, moderately- to well-cemented, fine- to medium-grained sandstones with minor conglomerates. The paleochannels form ridges and benches through differential weathering of surrounding mudstone overbank deposits. Lack of fines within channel fills suggest the streams were perennial. Paleofluvial parameters were calculated using meander wavelength or preserved channel width. Both members show a low average paleoslope (0.0007) and moderate sinuosity (1.8). Average bankful width is 34 m. The two members differ in thickness, channel occurrence, and morphology. The Salt Wash member is 45 m thick, with a 1.3 mud/sand ratio. Superimposed channels are common, and 50% of exposed channels represent point bars. The Brushy Basin member is 115 m thick, with a 3.2 mud/sand ratio, and thin, laterally extensive caliches. Channels are more isolated and 33% represent point bars. These results indicate that, while the paleoslope did not change between the members, the Brushy Basin (1) preserves more fines, (2) its floodplains were exposed longer in a drier environment, and (3) its channels migrated less than channels in the Salt Wash member.