GSA Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, USA - 2016

Paper No. 29-5
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM

WELLBORE FLOW SIMULATIONS FOR TEST WELLS, FORT IRWIN NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER, CALIFORNIA


O'LEARY, D.R.1, BUESCH, D.C.2, MILLER, D.M.2, DENSMORE, J.N.3 and NAWIKAS, J.M.1, (1)California Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, (2)Geology, Minerals, Energy, & Geophysics Science Center, U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, (3)California Water Science Center, U. S. Geological Survey, 6000 J Street Placer Hall, Sacramento, CA 95819, doleary@usgs.gov

Well-bore flow and aquifer-property data were collected from six long-screened test wells at the U.S. Army Fort Irwin National Training Center in the Mojave Desert, California. These data were used with other hydrogeologic data to provide a basis for basin-scale hydrogeologic framework and groundwater modeling efforts. Data collected under pumped conditions were used to estimate the vertical distribution of flow contribution to a well from the surrounding aquifer system. Well-bore flow was simulated for each well by using an integrated flow analysis tool, AnalyzeHOLE, to evaluate aquifer properties and heterogeneity. AnalyzeHOLE simulates a well and adjacent aquifer system with a two-dimensional MODFLOW model. This model assumes an axisymmetric, radial geometry, representing a central pumping well with surrounding aquifer materials. Horizontal layers within the model, (hydrogeologic units - HGUs) were initially defined based on lithostratigraphic-geophysical units (LGUs) established on the basis of interpretations of lithologic and geophysical logs from each well. The HGUs were simulated as radially symmetric, flat-lying, internally homogeneous, and laterally extensive throughout the model domain. The saturated hydraulic conductivity (K) of each HGU was adjusted so that the simulated well-bore flow/drawdown approximated the measured well-bore flow/drawdown. K values derived from the calibrated simulations ranged from <0.01 to 60 ft/day. In general LGUs provided good approximations for the boundaries of each HGU. Some LGU boundaries did not correspond to modeled HGUs; differences may be due to large-scale features such as fracturing or faulting, secondary mineralization/cementation, effects of well construction, or potential gradational changes between units that were modeled as sharp changes in aquifer properties at unit boundaries. Efforts were made to maintain consistent Ks within a given HGU across wells; however, calibrated Ks varied considerably in some HGUs between boreholes demonstrating the potential variability in hydraulic properties within a given LGU. Overall, well-bore flow simulation results show good correlation with the interpretations of geologic, geophysical, and airborne electromagnetic survey data used to generate the basin-scale hydrogeologic framework.