IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS WITH CRITICAL MINERALS RESOURCE POTENTIAL IN SIX GROUPS OF MINERAL DEPOSIT TYPES IN ALASKA
Statewide datasets were selected and scored based on their relevance for a specific deposit group, area covered, and importance for identifying mineral concentrations. High, medium, or low potential scores and certainty values were estimated using the areas of 12-digit hydrologic units as the spatial classification unit. Assignment of resource potential for specific deposit groups was determined based on scoring criteria; certainty values were based on the number of datasets contributing to the potential score.
Results are shown on maps keyed with the HUC-scale mineral resource potential for each deposit group. Noteworthy areas of potential are: 1) western and northern Alaska Range, Yukon-Tanana uplands, and known areas in the Darby-Hogatza, Kokrines-Hodzana, and southeast Alaska igneous belts, and Tofty-White Mountains for both REE-bearing peralkaline to carbonatitic intrusive rocks and tin-specialized granites, 2) southwestern Alaska and the Alaska Range for placer Au, in addition to known districts, 3) Yukon-Tanana uplands and known areas in the Brooks Range, Goodnews Bay, Kokrines-Hodzana belt, Alaska Range, Chugach Mountains, Kenai Peninsula, and southeastern Alaska for PGE-bearing deposits associated with mafic to ultramafic intrusive rocks, 4) Seward Peninsula, the western and northern Alaska Range, Yukon-Tanana uplands, and southeastern Alaska, and known areas in the southern Brooks Range and Wrangell Mountains for carbonate-hosted Cu, and 5) Kokrines-Hodzana belt, Yukon-Tanana uplands, and western and northern Alaska Range, and known areas of the Darby-Hogatza igneous belt for sandstone U.