SIZE-DIVERSITY TRENDS AND FEEDING-STRATEGY DISTRIBUTIONS IN BRACKISH-WATER ICHNOFOSSILS (Invited Presentation)
Although it may be contended that trace diameter is only meaningful within a single ichnogenera. We disposed of that approach for several reasons: 1) that method assumes all examples of a single ichnogenera are made by the same type of animal, which is untrue; 2) single ichnogenera are commonly too sporadic in their distribution to produce an analytical dataset; and 3) some types of animals show little size response to salinity.
Observed in both modern and ancient datasets, facies-crossing trace fossils, such as Planolites, Teichichnus, Cylindrichnus, Skolithos, Palaeophycus and Thalassinoides, are persistent. In the modern examples, the aforementioned trace fossils are dominantly used as a basis for shallow-tier deposit feeding and interface deposit feeding.
The syntheses of these case studies show the following patterns: (1) SDI decreases geometrically from marine sedimentary environments (SDI 100 to 200) into brackish-water (SDI 3 to 15) and SDI in fresh water is typically zero; (2) SDI considers population response to salinity fluctuations, not those of individual forms; (3) lowered SDI are ascribed to “enforced diminution”, for which salinity stress leads to shortened life cycles and excludes animals that are poor osmoregulators; and (4) previous studies describing the trace fossil assemblages of the brackish realm as "mixed Skolithos-Cruziana Ichnofacies" inadequately describe the feeding behaviours that are deployed.