HETEROGENEITY IN THE ARCHETYPE OF MESOTHERMAL DEPOSITS IN THE VAL D’OR MINING DISTRICT, QUEBEC, CANADA: MINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF TOURMALINE-PYRITE
Although belonging to the same family, the deposits display some difference. Samples from the Goldex, Lamaque, Lac Herbin and Beaufor mines were investigated, using a new methodology and mineralogical approach (monocrystal density and size fraction separation). Crystal fractions are analyzed with the binocular and a SEM-EDX, XRF and XRD techniques. LA-ICP-MS analyse has been run on 63 tourmalines.
The four mines display a similar mineralogical association of pyrite-tourmaline in quartz-tourmaline veins. However, several variations have been observed. Native gold is mostly associated with large pyrites with cubic shape in the < 100 μm size-fractions. Tourmaline displays three types: schorl, uvite and dravite. They are associated with specific size-fractions and pyrite habits. Each specific associations could be associated to a phases of mineralization. First, the crystallization of dravite-cubic gold-bearing pyrite association from a Mg-rich solution, then uvite-pyritohedron pyrite from Ca-Mg-rich fluid and last the schorl-shapeless pyrite from a Fe-rich solution. Each phase of mineralization, linked to different fluids, takes place in three distinct events from a Mg-rich to Fe-rich fluid. The gold mineralization occurred during the first phase with some Dravite in the Mg-rich fluid.
Nevertheless, this heterogeneity between the samples supposedly from the same hydrothermal event allows to call this hypothesis into question. This variability is also supported by Re-Os datings on gold showing different age. The archetypal Val d’Or orogenic golds district is therefore polyphased.