PATHWAYS FOR SUCCESS: RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION INTO THE GEOSCIENCES
We used institutional (IPEDS, admissions, fall census, graduation rates), survey (majors, non-majors, and students who have never taken a geoscience course), and interview (majors and non-majors) data from a small liberal arts college in the upper Midwest. Between 2011 and 2015 participation in each step of the undergraduate geoscience pathway (e.g., enrolling in a geoscience first year seminar, electing to major in the geosciences, completing the geoscience major) varies greatly among different demographic groups. Whereas female students enroll in geoscience classes (56% of students in classes) at a slightly lower than representative rates (58% of students at the college are female), they make up a larger portion of students who complete the major (61%). Students of color also enroll in classes at a high rate (18% in geoscience classes vs. 14% at the school) but they do not elect to major in geology (7% of geoscience majors). International students make up a large portion of the college (12%) but they are not attracted to geoscience courses nor to major in geoscience (4% and 2% respectively).
Our results indicate that underrepresentation is more a challenge of participation and recruitment than of retention. Although a first-year seminar program is an effective recruitment tool, more must be done. Three key themes – community, curricular sequencing and design, and an understanding of the geoscience discipline – emerge from this study as important factors affecting participation, recruitment, and retention into the geosciences. In particular, a fundamental understanding of the nature of the discipline seems to have a critical role in recruitment to the geology major. Curricular sequencing and design, along with the importance of community, are important factors in the decision to remain on the geoscience pathway.