GSA Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, USA - 2016

Paper No. 194-3
Presentation Time: 8:15 AM

USING LEAF EPIDERMIS TO UNLOCK THE ANCIENT FOREST RECONSTRUCTION ENIGMA


DUNN, Regan E., Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, PO BOX 351800, Seattle, WA 98195; Botany, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071, BARCLAY, Richard S., Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20530-7012 and CURRANO, Ellen D., Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Department of Botany, 3065, 1000 E. University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071, rdunn@fieldmuseum.org

Leaf epidermis is a complex and flexible tissue that serves as the interface between a plant and its environment. Cell patterning of this tissue (e.g. cell frequency, density, and size of pavement cells, trichomes and guard cells) is determined during leaf development and it is controlled in part by environmental cues that ensure optimized water balance, photosynthetic capacity and gas exchange capabilities. Light is a significant cue for cell patterning and it has been observed that pavement cell morphology (cell surface area and degree of undulation) is highly correlated with the amount of solar radiation a leaf receives during morphogenesis. The morphology of pavement cell phytoliths presumably derived from ferns, dicots and non-grass monocots, has been used as a shade-based proxy to estimate canopy density using the variable Leaf Area Index1.

This phytolith based LAI proxy, termed rLAI, does not take into account the taxonomy of the phytoliths, as it is impossible to identify which taxa produced them. Instead, it is assumed that cell morphology is environmentally controlled, rather than phylogenetically determined. Here we test whether there is a phylogenetic signal in adaxial pavement cell morphology within angiosperms from ~900 taxa available in the Cuticle Database (http://cuticledb.eesi.psu.edu/). We also compare pavement cell morphology to growth form, phenology, leaf size and Leaf Mass per Area (LMA) data. We find that: 1) there is no phylogenetic signal for cell area and degree of undulation among angiosperms, 2) tree species have smaller cells than other growth forms, 3) there is no difference in cell morphology between deciduous and evergreen species, 4) epidermal cell size is not correlated to leaf size and 5) LMA cannot be predicted from epidermal cell size or density. Additionally, we present preliminary cell morphologic data from dispersed leaf cuticles that suggest LAI can also be predicted from organically preserved leaf cuticles. 1 Dunn, R.E., Strömberg, C., Madden, R., Kohn, M., and Carlini, A., 2015, Linked canopy, climate, and faunal change in the Cenozoic of Patagonia: Science, v. 347, p. 258–261.