Paper No. 2-2
The Precambrian transition from an anoxic to an oxic atmosphere was once described as a unidirectional step-wise function, with the Great Oxidation Event (2.5-2.3 Ga) and Neoproterozoic Oxidation Event (0.8 Ga) marking two increases in atmospheric and marine O
2 levels. The period of low atmospheric O
2 in between was dubbed the “boring billion”, but recent research supports a more dynamic evolution influenced by exchanges between the sources and sinks of O
2. The lack of Cr isotopic fractionation in ironstone formations until 0.8 Ga has been suggested to indicate insufficient O
2 (<0.1% of present atmospheric level, PAL) to oxidize and weather continental Cr.
1 This work has important implications for the delayed rise of animals, as the earliest metazoans and last common ancestors of animals had O
2 requirements of 0.5% PAL.
2 Surface ocean oxygenation, though, allowed significant evolution to occur including the rise of modern eukaryotes.
3 Additionally, recent estimates of mid-Proterozoic O
2 levels, based on redox-sensitive element concentrations in deepwater shales, are as high as 4% PAL.
4 Different isotopic paleoredox proxies could resolve these arguments. However, the range of sensitivity to oxygenation for other proxies is either too high or low for the mid-Proterozoic.
Tellurium (Te) isotope ratios (130Te/125Te) may provide greater detail about atmospheric O2 levels over the mid-Proterozoic. Te isotope ratios would be invariant as long as Te remained in reduced forms, but would “light up” once conditions promoted its oxidation to the +4 and/or +6 valence. The reduction of Te(VI) to Te(0) produces a kinetic isotope effect mediated abiotically (ε130/125: -4‰) or biologically (ε130/125: -5‰).5,6 Based on known thermodynamic data, the redox (Eh) threshold at which isotopic fractionation would begin is greater than that of U and less than that of Cr. We have established an improved method for measuring 130Te/125Te and are analyzing samples from Precambrian paleosols and marine ironstones to begin developing this new paleoredox indicator.
[1] Planavsky et al. (2014) Science 346,235-238
[2] Mills et al. (2014) PNAS 111,4168–4172
[3] Knoll (2014) Perspect. on Biol. 6,a016121
[4] Zhang et al. (2016) PNAS,in press
[6] Smithers and Krause (1968) Can. Journ. Chemistry 46,583-591
[7] Baesman et al. (2007) AEM 73, 2135-2143