Start |Author Index | View Uploaded Presentations | Meeting Information

Northeastern Section - 51st Annual Meeting - 2016

Paper No. 49-6
Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM

CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF TOOTH TISSUES IN MODERN AND FOSSIL SHARKS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PALEOCEANOGRAPHIC STUDIES IN THE ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTAL PLAINS DURING THE CENOZOIC


PILAPIL, Sanserei Aiah1, POPCAKOVA, Fatima1, JOHNSON, Qiaxian Re'Mar1, GRIFFITHS, Michael L.2, BECKER, Martin A.3 and CHAUHAN, Bhanu P.S.1, (1)Department of Chemistry, William Paterson University, 300 Pompton Road, Wayne, NJ 07470, (2)Environmental Science, William Paterson University, 300 Pompton Rd, Wayne, NJ 07470, (3)Department of Environmental Science, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, popcakovaf@student.wpunj.edu

Tooth tissues from an assemblage of modern and fossil sharks from the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts were analyzed utilizing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), electron disruptive spectrophotometer (SEM/EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Modern teeth were collected from sharks captured off the coasts of New Jersey and Florida and included the lamniform Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810 and carcharhiniform Carcharhinus brevipinna (Müller and Henle 1839). Fossil teeth were collected from middle Cenozoic sediments in New Jersey and Alabama and included the lamniform Striatolamia macrota Agassiz, 1843 and carcharhiniform Physogaleus secundus (Winkler, 1876).

Chemical analysis revealed differences between the fluoroapatite Ca5(PO4)F comprising the enameloid and dentine in both modern lamniform and carcharhiniform teeth. We attribute these differences to varying amounts of chemical substitutions of phosphate by carbonate and fluoride by hydroxide in the crystal lattice of the more porous and permeable dentine tooth tissues. These chemical differences were not observed in the fossil lamniform and carcharhiniform teeth. We interpret this to represent groundwater percolation, solutioning and diagenesis in the burial site. This fossilization process, which commonly stains shark teeth, has resulted in uniform recrystallization throughout the enameloid and dentine.

A growing body of literature has identified the potential utility of shark teeth as proxies for chemical paleoceanography. Our results demonstrate the need for careful laboratory cleaning and protocol in order to remove the potentially adverse effects of staining and recrystallization in the burial site. Modern lamniform and carcharhiniform teeth from locations with known ocean temperature and chemistry hold the key to utilizing analogous fossil taxa in reconstructing ancestral seawater chemistry and temperature.

Session No. 49--Booth# 64

T30. Processes in Biogeochemistry and Biomineralization (Posters)
Tuesday, 22 March 2016: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM
Convention Hall (Empire State Plaza Convention Center)
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 2
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016NE-272731
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.
Back to: T30. Processes in Biogeochemistry and Biomineralization (Posters)
<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract