COMPARATIVE STUDY OF METHODS FOR DELINEATING WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA IN UNCONFINED COASTAL AQUIFER
Comparison and uncertainty analysis for WHPA delineation were performed at two pumping sites located on the unconfined coastal aquifer in Israel: a single well and a wellfield consisting of eight pumping wells. Five delineation methods were used, with each method belonging to one of three categories: analytical, semi-analytical or numerical. Numerical modeling with MODFLOW-MODPATH was selected as the reference method. The comparison showed that the semi-analytical method fits the reference WHPA best, while analytical methods overestimated WHPA when implemented in the unconfined aquifer. This indicates that water balance and regional flow characteristics are two essential factors for delineating an appropriate WHPA. Through comparing the results from the wellfield with results from the single well, interferences between the wellfield wells were identified. These interferences significantly reduced the accuracy of the analytical methods when they were applied to the wellfield. Stochastic modeling with Latin Hypercube Sampling was employed for analyzing the uncertainty of the numerical method. Results showed that a series of probabilistic WHPAs, instead of a deterministic protection area, can be generated by considering the uncertainty in the input parameters. This can provide a more nuanced paradigm for designing WHPAs in heterogeneous aquifers.