GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017

Paper No. 246-11
Presentation Time: 4:25 PM

ALL SMEARED? GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT AT GEOLOGIC TIME SCALES


EIZENHÖFER, Paul R.1, MCQUARRIE, Nadine1, EHLERS, Todd A.2 and SHELEF, Eitan1, (1)Geology and Environmental Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4107 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260-3332, (2)Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 56, Tübingen, 72074, Germany, peizen@pitt.edu

Landscapes represent the interaction between surface processes, rock properties, and tectonic deformation. In active fold-thrust belts rock uplift is controlled by the geometry of the detachment fault, specifically, the location and angle of fault ramps. These ramps are associated with high topography, significant relief and steep river channels. However, such rock uplift is more complex in that it comprises both vertical and horizontal components of displacement, and thus raises the question whether geomorphic markers of uplift can be laterally displaced. In the hinterland of the Himalaya, where high erosion rates accompany high convergence rates of ~ 20 mm/yr, normalized channel steepness (ksn) values increase to the north over ~ 25 km with the highest values marking the proposed location of the active ramp. Similarly, in the Andes, where low erosion rates attend low convergence rates of ~ 5-10 mm/yr, ksn values increase westward over ~ 40 km. These ksn values that decrease in the direction of movement may indicate decreasing uplift, or may be a function of horizontal displacement. The question arises, how the relationship between convergence rates, rock erodibility and thrust ramp geometry might affect topography, relief, and ksn values. In this study, we explore the displacement of ksn values (i) analytically, by quantifying ksn migration in 1D through a ratio of erodibility over convergence rate, and (ii) numerically by integrating realistic displacement kinematics with the Cascade landscape evolution algorithm in 3D. Our results indicate that a horizontal movement component causes an asymmetry in topography and relief, and a smearing of ksn in the direction of movement away from the vertical uplift field. The extent of this shift is dependent on the ratio of erodibility over convergence rate for a given structural geometry. As this ratio decreases, such that convergence rates are significantly higher than erosion (~ 5-10 times), the smearing can extend to tens of km from the ramp front. Sets of parameters that are representative for the hinterland of the Himalaya and the Andes have low erodibility to convergence ratios such that ksn values are smeared over such a distance. Thus, we argue that the interpretation of geomorphic markers at convergent orogens requires consideration of horizontal displacement.