WHERE’S THE RHYOLITE? EVIDENCE FOR MELT LOSS AND CRYSTAL ACCUMULATION IN THE TUOLUMNE INTRUSIVE COMPLEX
Amp/bulk-rock Fe-MgKD values range from 0.2 - 0.64. Several analyses are outside the recommended range of 0.28 ± 0.12 for Fe-MgKD equilibria [5]. Most analyses with Fe-MgKD values that lie outside the equilibrium range occur in either KC or eHD samples with bulk-rock SiO2 contents < 65 wt%; whereas in more silicic samples, Fe-MgKD indicates that bulk-rock compositions reflect melt compositions. A direct link between Amp and melt composition has also been proposed [5,6,7]. These approaches suggest that most TIC Amp were in equilibrium with rhyolitic melts (> 65 SiO2, < 0.5 MgO, < 1.5 FeO wt%). Finally, several compositional similarities can be drawn between Amp from the TIC and those from the Fish Canyon Tuff, which have been experimentally determined to have crystallized from rhyolitic melts [8]. Therefore, it seems probable that crystal accumulation and/or melt extraction (e.g. eruption) has played an important role in the compositional variability of the outer KC and eHD units whereas the more interior porphyritic Half Dome and Cathedral Peak units have bulk-rock compositions that are permissively similar to melt compositions from which TIC Amp crystallized.
[1] Bateman, Chapell (1979) GSA Bull. 90: 465-482. [2] Memeti, et al., (2010). GSA Bull. 122: 1912-1931. [3] Economos., et al. (2010). GSA Spec. Paper 100: 173-183. [4] Deering, Bachmann. (2010). EPSL 297: 324-331. [5] Putirka,. (2016). Am. Min. 101: 841-858. [6] Ridolfi, Renzulli (2012). Contrib. Min. Pet. 163(5): 877-895. [7] Zhang, et al. (2017). Am. Min. 102(6): 1353-1367. [8] Johnson, Rutherford (1989). Geology 17(9): 837-841.