DIAMOND FORMATION THROUGH ISOCHEMICAL COOLING OF CHO FLUIDS VS REDOX BUFFERING: EXAMPLES FROM MARANGE PERIDOTITIC AND ZIMMI ECLOGITIC DIAMONDS
Diamond growth from reduced species should show decreasing δ13C from core to rim with decreasing [N], however within CH4-bearing sectors of Marange diamonds, such reduced trends are not observed. Rather, δ13C increases from core to rim2. These contradictory observations can be explained through either mixing between CH4- and CO2-rich hydrous fluids2 or through precipitation from already mixed CH4-CO2 hydrous fluids3. These results demonstrate that Marange diamonds could not precipitate during redox buffering. This non-redox model for diamond formation from cooling hydrous fluids is indicated for many gem-quality peridotitic diamonds3.
By contrast diamond formation in eclogitic assemblages is not well constrained. One Zimmi eclogitic diamond (Sierra Leone), has a core-to-rim trend of decreasing δ13C (-23.4 to -24.5 %) and [N] indicative of reduced fluids. These fluids were likely recycled during Neoproterozoic subduction (Re-Os diamond age of 650 Ma overlaps with timing of subduction4). Unlike CH4-CO2 hydrous fluids, isochemical cooling of such reduced CHO fluids is not efficient at forming diamonds and would not result in measurable carbon isotopic variations (i.e., 1‰ variation seen). Rather, this Zimmi diamond likely formed through redox buffering of reduced subduction-related fluids, infiltrating into more oxidised eclogite.
1. Luth and Stachel, 2014. CMP, 168, 1083 2. Smit et al., 2016. Lithos, 265, 68-81 3. Stachel et al., EPSL 473, 44-51 4. Smit et al., 2016. Precamb Res, 286, 152-166