GSA Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - 2018

Paper No. 124-10
Presentation Time: 4:00 PM

STABLE BROMINE ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION OF COAL BED METHANE (CBM) PRODUCED WATER


STOTLER, Randy L.1, KIRK, Matthew F.2, FRAPE, Shaun K.3 and GWYNNE, Rhys3, (1)Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1414 Naismith Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, (2)Dept. of Geology, Kansas State University, 108 Thompson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, (3)Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada

As a result of their generally conservative behavior, bromide and chloride compositions in natural waters have long been used as environmental tracers. While the distribution of stable bromine isotopes (81Br/79Br) in natural waters remains a rudimentary snapshot; it is already clear that the stable bromine and chlorine (37Cl/35Cl) isotopic compositions in natural waters do not always correlate well. The range of stable bromine isotopic values is often much larger than theoretically expected, indicating fractionating processes and factors are still unknown. To help identify possible processes, this study will characterize the stable bromine and chlorine isotopic composition in a high-organic matter subsurface environment with active methanogenic bacterial populations. Produced water and gas from coal bed methane (CBM) wells perforated within the coal and shale units of the Cherokee Basin in southeastern Kansas, USA, were analyzed for δ37Cl, δ81Br, and 87Sr/86Sr isotopic compositions at the University of Waterloo Environmental Isotope Lab. These data were combined with existing water and gas chemistry and isotopic composition data to characterize halogen isotopic composition within the CBM play.

Compared with seawater evaporation, a slight excess of bromide is evident in 3 of 15 samples. The range of δ37Cl values was smaller than δ81Br values, with δ37Cl between -0.81 and +0.68 ‰ (SMOC), and δ81Br values between -0.01 and +2.71 ‰ (SMOB). Sr isotopic data cluster in two groups, and correlate with fluid temperatures, providing an effective measure of cross-formational flow, yet trends with depth and Cl, Br, and Sr isotopes are not evident. A significant number of analysis at this site (60%) compared with the worldwide groundwater database (4%) sampled water with δ81Br values above 2.00‰. It is suspected that interactions of dissolved bromide with bromine in organic-rich units and/or gas phase are affecting the isotopic composition.