GSA Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - 2018

Paper No. 184-3
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:30 PM

SUPERHEAVY PYRITE FORMATION IN HYPERSALINE LAKES OF EAST AFRICA: A PALEOSALINITY PROXY FOR LAKE MAGADI HSPDP CORES


WYNN, Jonathan G.1, LOWENSTEIN, Tim K.2, RENAUT, Robin W.3, OWEN, R. Bernhart4 and MCNULTY, Emma P.2, (1)Division of Earth Sciences, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA 22314, (2)Department of Geological Sciences and Environmental Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, (3)Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada, (4)Dept. of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

Superheavy pyrite (pyrite showing “reversed fractionation”, i.e., enriched in 34S compared to its source or coexisting sulfate) is well known in both ancient and modern marine environments, although mechanisms for its origin have been debated (Fike et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2018). Despite much of this debate, relatively minor effort has been made to document and understand modern occurrences of superheavy pyrite, particularly in terrestrial settings. In any biochemical pathway involving a negative fractionation factor, superheavy pyrite formation must involve both a mechanism for 34S-enrichment of a sulfate reservoir compared to its source, and sulfate reduction from this distinct 34S-enriched reservoir. Here, we describe a mechanism that incorporates these two processes and documents the formation of superheavy pyrite in hypersaline lakes of East Africa (Lakes Magadi and Nasikie Engida, Kenya). As salinity increases in these shallow and highly evaporative lakes, there is a net loss of sulfate compared to conservative ions. As this evaporative concentration proceeds, dissolved sulfate used in microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) is continuously enriched in 34S compared to the source sulfate (the latter occurring as hot spring waters entering the lakes). Although no sulfate minerals are precipitated from the evolving lake waters, the volatile loss of 34S-depleted sulfide by MSR leaves the remaining sulfate reservoir continuously 34S-enriched with respect to the initial source sulfate. Thus sulfide minerals precipitated in sediments would appear “superheavy” in the sedimentary record. We describe a model that couples the rate of evaporative concentration to the rate of sulfate reduction and sulfide loss, and thereby describes the 34S/32S ratio of sulfide minerals preserved as a function of salinity. We consider the implications of this mechanism for the environments represented by superheavy pyrite preserved in terrestrial sediments of the East African Rift System. We suggest that this mechanism, documented from the waters of Lakes Magadi and nearby Nasikie Engida, can be applied to understand paleosalinity variations recorded by pyrite in sediment cores from hypersaline lakes such as the HSPDP Lake Magadi (MGD) core, and thus provide additional context for paleoclimate records of human evolution.