SERPENTINIZATION OF THE UNIONVILLE SERPENTINE BARRENS: A GEOCHEMICAL AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY
Over twenty-five samples were collected during field work and based on the rock textures (foliation, color, etc.) and field relationships. Five unique groups of serpentinite samples were identified. Eleven samples, representative of the groups, were chosen for thin section production. Petrographic analysis revealed the presence of various pseudomorphic textures, including mesh (lizardite after olivine), hourglass (mainly lizardite after olivine) and bastite (lizardite after pyroxene, amphibole, phyllosilicates). Based on thin section microstructures and textures, three distinct groups were identified: large mesh nets (1.0 – 0.5 mm), small mesh nets (<0.5 mm), and hourglass mixed with mesh. The field groups and thin section groups did not correlate and internally did not exhibit systematic trends. While bastite textures were observed in some thin sections, they were the minority component. Relict olivine can be seen in mesh centers in five of the samples, however, this texture is not restricted to an individual group.
Ten samples were selected for geochemical analyses of major and trace elements. Bulk rock loss on ignition data (used as a proxy for water content) indicates that the outer edge of the serpentinite body is more hydrous than the interior, however, this trend does not correlate with the presence of relict grains. Plotting on petrogenetic discrimination diagrams yields an island arc basalt signature suggesting that the Unionville serpentinite body was part of an arc system prior to serpentinization.