INFLUENCE OF BEDROCK GEOLOGY AND LAND USE ON HABITAT AND WATER QUALITY IN TWO BLUE RIVER WATERSHEDS WITH DIFFERING MANAGEMENT PLANS
Two watersheds of the upper Blue River, the Salem and South watersheds, differ significantly in land use and bedrock geology and have different watershed management strategies. The Salem watershed has higher percentages of urban and agricultural land, has predominantly limestone bedrock, and has a watershed management plan in place. Conversely, the South fork has a higher percentage of forested land and siltstone bedrock and does not have a watershed management plan in place.
To determine how these watershed factors impact stream quality, five sites in the Salem fork and five sites in the South fork were tested for water chemistry, macroinvertebrate assemblage, and sediment distribution in the summer of 2017. Preliminary results suggest that the South fork showed better ecological condition than the Salem fork and that high amounts of cultivated crops and developed land negatively impacted stream quality. These results will be used by The Nature Conservancy, an organization that protects ecologically valuable areas, for developing watershed management strategies and furthering conservation within the South and Salem fork watersheds.