GSA Annual Meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, USA - 2019

Paper No. 17-3
Presentation Time: 8:45 AM

INTEGRATING GRACE SATELLITE DATA AND GROUND-BASED MONITORING AND MODELING TO ASSESS WATER STORAGE CHANGES IN U.S. AQUIFERS


SCANLON, Bridget R.1, RATEB, Ashraf2, ZHANG, Zizhan3, POOL, Don4, SANFORD, Ward E.5, ZELL, Wes5, FAUNT, Claudia C.6, MCGUIRE, Virginia L.7, REITZ, Meredith D.8, XIA, Youlong9, SAVE, Himanshu10, WIESE, David11, CROTEAU, Michael12, SWENSON, Sean13 and RODELL, Matthew14, (1)Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd., Austin, TX 78758-4445, (2)University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, 10100 Burnet RD, Austin, TX 78758, (3)State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 340 Xudong Street, Wuhan, (4)Arizona Water Science Center, U.S Geological Survey, 520 N Park Avenue, Tucson, TX 85719, (5)U.S. Geological Survey, 431 National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, (6)U.S. Geological Survey, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, (7)U.S. Geological Survey, 5231 South 19th Street, Lincoln, NE 68502, (8)National Research Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, (9)Environmental Modeling Center (EMC), National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740, College Park, MD, MD 20740, (10)Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W Braker Lane, Austin, TX 78759-5321, (11)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, (12)Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt , MD, Greenbelt, MD 20771, (13)NCAR, Boulder, CO 80307, (14)NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, Code 617, bldg 33, rm G227, Greenbelt, MD 20771

GRACE satellite data have been extremely valuable in highlighting water storage changes in response to climate and human water use; however, the data are vertically integrated from the land surface to depth. Disaggregating the change in total water storage attributed to changes in surface water, soil moisture, or groundwater, requires additional data from models or monitoring to interpret the GRACE data. Traditionally, ground-based monitoring and regional modeling have been used to assess groundwater storage changes in U.S. aquifers; however, uncertainties in storage coefficients and modeling impact results. Integrating GRACE and ground-based data should advance our understanding of water storage changes with modeling and monitoring used to interpret GRACE water storage changes and GRACE data constraining regional models and monitoring results. We evaluated GRACE total water storage anomalies for major aquifers in the U.S. for 2003 – 2017 and used regional models and groundwater monitoring data to interpret the GRACE data. Results from GRACE data show large interannual variability in total water storage, particularly in the Central Valley, Arizona Alluvial Basins, and High Plains regions in response to wet and dry climate cycles. In contrast, regional water storage changes in more humid regions are much lower, such as the Columbia Basin and the Mississippi aquifer system. Calculated groundwater storage from GRACE data by subtracting other component storages from global models compare favorably with regional modeling and groundwater monitoring data in most basins. Discrepancies between GRACE and ground-based data in some basins, particularly the Mississippi Embayment Regional Aquifer System, provide valuable insights for improving our understanding of these systems. Water storage changes in response to wet and dry climate cycles are amplified (e.g. Central Valley and High Plains) or damped by human intervention. Integration of satellite and ground-based data advances our understanding of water storage changes in these basins.