ILMENITE LAMELLAE IN {111} OF HOST MAGNETITE: EXSOLUTION OR OXIDATION ORIGIN?
Lattard’s work has been taken by some authors as grounds for rejecting the oxidation origin of {111} ilmenite in spinel, despite her statement “In most terrestrial rocks, however, spinel + ilmenite intergrowths are certainly best interpreted as resulting from oxidation...” Here we point out severe limits on the amount of ilmss that can form by direct exsolution.
At 1300ºC, the cation deficiency at 1 atm. corresponds to ~15 mol % equivalent ilmss. The amounts at 1200ºC and 1100ºC are even lower, ~ 4-12 mol % and ~3-8 mol %. Yet commonly magmas do not become saturated with two Fe-Ti oxides until they cool to 1100ºC and below, so the possible extent of cation deficiency in the spinel must be in the latter range or lower. Furthermore, limited data show that the molar volumes of cation-deficient Fe-Ti spinels are larger than the equivalent stoichiometric spinel plus ilmss, suggesting that the extent of deficiency will be lower in plutonic rocks than in volcanics at the same T. We are testing this idea by synthesizing Fe-Ti spinel (ilmss) at 1300ºC and 1 atm., then reheating it at the same T but at 5 Kbar (0.5 GPa).
Bottom line: The amount of ilmss that can form by direct exsolution from Fe-Ti spinel is probably 3-8% or less for volcanic rocks, and even lower for plutonic rocks. Greater amounts of {111} ilmss must have formed by oxidation of Fe2TiO4 component in the spinel.