THE GEOLOGY OF CRYPTIC SUTURES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE WESTERN GREATER CAUCASUS
New analytical techniques have improved the ability to differentiate units joined by a cryptic suture. Here, we propose revised geologic criteria for identifying former ocean basins closed by cryptic sutures. Major differences in radiometric age of igneous or metamorphic rocks provide a first-order indication of a suture, though like Moores (1981), we emphasize the importance of multiple lines of evidence. Provenance data, including U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes in detrital zircon, can identify differences in crustal evolution between domains juxtaposed by a suture. Finally, differences in thermal histories across sutures may be identified with thermochronology and geothermometry.
The Greater Caucasus (GC) defines the northern margin of Arabia-Eurasia collision and localizes most orogen-perpendicular shortening in the region. The GC formed by closure of a Mesozoic marine basin between GC basement and the Lesser Caucasus (LC) arc. In one model, subduction of a back-arc basin culminated in Miocene-Pliocene collision and suturing. An alternate view is Eocene-Oligocene rift inversion without suturing. Despite the absence of an ophiolite, detrital zircon U-Pb analyses indicate a spatial shift in provenance from GC to LC affinity within the closed basin, suggesting stratigraphic variation. (U-Th)/He analyses suggest that this shift correlates with offsets in magnitude of exhumation, implying structural juxtapositions. Additional radiometric, geochemical, and Raman spectroscopic analyses will help evaluate whether there is a cryptic suture in the GC and unravel the complex history of continental assembly in the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone.