HOW TO DATE A CLAY GOUGE? A CASE STUDY FROM TATRA MOUNTAINS, POLAND
The bulk mineral composition of gouge materials was quartz, plagioclase, K-feldspar, dioctahedral mica (2M1, 1M, and 1Md), smectite, and chlorite. Investigation of clay size fractions indicated the presence of mixed-layer R1 illite-smectite and kaolinite along with phases present in bulk. Large variability of gouge compositions among the investigated zones was noted.
Vacuum encapsulated Ar-Ar dates were obtained for four size fractions of one feldspar-free gouge. Three different approaches were used for extracting end-member ages (Tab. 1), including a three-component model proposed in this study.
Tab. 1. Preliminary age values of illite polytypes present in the clay gouge sample (in Ma) obtained with different approaches.
Polytype |
Illite Age Analysis* |
MODELAGE** |
3 component system |
2M1 |
204.6 ± 31 |
183.8 ± 29 |
33.1 ± 23 |
1M |
10.4 ± 11 |
5.4 ± 13 |
189.8 ± 21 |
1Md |
2.8 ± 5 |
* Pevear (1992)
**Szczerba and Środoń (2009)
Timing of fault activity was highly dependent on the method used for age calculation. Methods handling two-component system returned age values in rough agreement, pointing towards a young age of the authigenic component and at least a partial age reset of the “inherited” component during Alpine orogeny. The results of three-component age modeling indicated, however, that the assumption underlying conventional age analysis i.e. that 1M and 1Md illite polytypes form at the same time, may not be always valid.
Acknowledgments:
AK thanks the Clay Minerals Society for founding the research with a Student Research Grant.
References:
Pevear, D.R. (1992) Illite age analysis, a new tool for basin thermal history analysis Pp. 1251-1254 in: Water-Rock Interaction (Y.K. Kharaka and A.S. Maest, editors). A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Szczerba, M. and Środoń, J. (2009) Extraction of diagenetic and detrital ages and of the 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio from K-Ar dates of clay fractions. Clay Clay Miner, 57, 93-103.