SUBGLACIAL KARST DEVELOPMENT IN EAST-CENTRAL NEW YORK STATE
The potential catchment area required to develop large-diameter vadose infeeder conduits and a large phreatic conduit in the cave is not available from the present-day watershed. Seasonal variation in the quantity of warm-based subglacial meltwater, over tens of thousands of years, has resulted in alternating vadose and epiphreatic conditions developed behind a hydraulically inefficient or occluded outlet (not multiple phreatic conduits graded to changing base levels). At a second conduit constriction at a three-chert bed sequence (~ 75 cm thick), downward flow of high velocity meltwater has resulted in floodwater passage development elevationally above most of the cave (Pixie Passages).
A number of lines of evidence support substantial subglacial cave development from the influx of glacial meltwater. Factors supporting this interpretation include 1) numerous high-volume water and sediment inflow locations that have no relation to the surrounding hydrologic setting, 2) master phreatic conduit dimensions too large to have solely formed from existing watershed inflow (~ 9 m2), 3) small wavelength scallops on infeeder canyon walls that document high-velocity inflow (e.g., 1 m/sec), 4) sediment profiles that extend far upgradient within infeeder conduits that are unrelated to the surrounding hydrologic setting, and 5) doubling of pre-Wisconsinan phreatic discharge along the master conduit resulting from subglacial infeeder inflows (~ 0.18 m3/sec to 0.33 m3/sec as determined by analysis of scallop wavelengths and conduit dimensions).