GSA 2020 Connects Online

Paper No. 174-8
Presentation Time: 10:45 AM

SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE CA. 1730 MA WOLLOGORANG FORMATION, MCARTHUR BASIN, AUSTRALIA


KUNZMANN, Marcus1, CROMBEZ, Vincent2, CATUNEANU, Octavian3, BLAIKIE, Teagan1, BARTH, Gregor4 and COLLINS, Alan S.5, (1)CSIRO Mineral Resources, Australian Resources Research Centre, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia, (2)Deep Earth Imaging Future Science Platform, CSIRO Energy, Australian Resources Research Centre, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia, (3)Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada, (4)Landesamt fuer Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie, Guestrow, IN 18273, Germany, (5)Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia

The ca. 1730 Ma Wollogorang Formation is a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic unit in the southern McArthur Basin of northern Australia. It is an exploration target for base metals and may be a petroleum source unit and unconventional reservoir. Facies analysis indicates that the Wollogorang Formation records deposition in supratidal to offshore environments. Lateral consistency in facies, thickness, and stratigraphic architecture suggests deposition on an east-west trending (present coordinates) epeiric platform. According to recent tectonic models for northern Australia, this epeiric platform likely deepened to the present-day east. The Wollogorang Formation comprises one second-order and five nested third-order sequences. Despite the unavailability of biostratigraphy and biofacies, and the general poor time control in Precambrian basins, we are able to correlate third-order (i.e., our lowest rank) sequences over tens to hundreds of kilometers using high-resolution facies and petrophysical logs. As the distinction between stratigraphic sequences (related to shoreline shifts) and sedimentological bedsets (not related to shoreline shifts) becomes more difficult with decreasing hierarchical level, sedimentological, stratigraphic, paleontological, and mineralogical (including diagenetic) criteria were recently proposed to distinguish these cycles. Our study suggests that sedimentological and stratigraphic criteria are the most useful in Precambrian sequence stratigraphy. In contrast, paleontological criteria are irrelevant in Precambrian successions. Mineralogical (including diagenetic) criteria have not been tested in this study. In addition to further study these criteria, we suggest testing geochemical criteria, such as the enrichment of redox-sensitive trace elements and minor carbonate carbon isotope variation, to distinguish stratigraphic sequences from sedimentological bedsets.