STRUCTURAL CONTROLS AND TIMING OF GOLD IN SE CALIFORNIA
We use field observations, microscopy, whole-rock geochemistry, and geochronology to constrain the timing of the various structures and alteration assemblages, and determine with which of these the gold is associated. Together, these data suggest that gold was introduced with the sulfides, which were preferentially precipitated where the mineralizing fluids encountered reactive magnetite, within a bend in a broad ductile shear zone. This is supported by the age constraints: U-Pb analysis of titanite in nearby deformed granite, and of zircon in the abundant syn-kinematic pegmatites, constrain ductile shearing to ~65 Ma, within error of the sulfide Re-Os age. Subsequent brittle faulting, constrained to after ~54 Ma by apatite U-Pb cooling ages, locally reactivated the ductile foliation. Oxidizing fluids introduced during or after this brittle faulting resulted in extensive supergene alteration, locally remobilizing and upgrading the gold.
Thus, gold at Oro Cruz was initially introduced during ductile Laramide thrusting, much like in the thrust-hosted deposits of the Caborca Orogenic Gold Belt of NW Mexico. However, the Laramide-age fabric was reactivated during subsequent brittle faulting, and the gold-sulfide mineralization oxidized, causing it to resemble the detachment-hosted deposits of especially Arizona. This may suggest that some (or all) of the gold in detachment- and transform-hosted deposits of the region may have been originally introduced during Laramide deformation, and thus form part of the Caborca Orogenic Gold Belt.