CONTRIBUTION OF SUBLIMATION FROM BURIED AND SURFACE WATER ICE TO CERES’ EXOSPHERE (Invited Presentation)
We first determined whether sublimation from a global buried H2O ice table could explain the observed vapor flux. We found that a buried H2O ice table could not explain the full ~6 kg/s vapor production and simultaneously satisfy the latitudinal hydrogen variation observed by GRaND [3,4].
Other sources were considered for Ceres’ exospheric H2O. We modeled the loss of vapor from nine known exposed H2O ice patches [5,6] and found that their total maximum vapor production was ~0.06 kg/s. We considered local, shallow ice at the ~92 km diameter Occator impact crater [e.g., 7]. Expected H2O ice concentrations [6] resulted in a maximum of ~0.01 kg/s of vapor. New, <100 m diameter, impact craters could also expose H2O ice patches, with vapor production widely varying up to ~0.5 kg/s [6].
The contributions from each current source of surface and near-surface H2O ice on Ceres are individually small, but together they could deliver several tenths of a kg/s of H2O vapor to Ceres’ exosphere. While other processes like solar energetic particle sputtering events [e.g., 8] could also contribute to the exosphere, sublimation from buried and surface water ice plays an observationally-constrained and consistent role in Ceres’ exosphere. Previous inferred vapor production rates [e.g., 2] should be revisited in light of Dawn-based results.
[1] Castillo-Rogez & McCord, 2010, Icarus 205
[2] Kuppers et al., 2014, Nature 505
[3] Prettyman et al., 2017, Science 355
[4] Landis et al., 2017, JGR: Planets, 122
[5] Combe et al., 2019, Icarus, 319
[6] Landis et al., 2019, JGR: Planets,124
[7] Scully et al., 2019, Icarus, 320
[8] Villarreal et al. 2017, AJ, 838