GSA 2020 Connects Online

Paper No. 74-7
Presentation Time: 3:15 PM

REVISITING HOTSPOTS AND CONTINENTAL BREAKUP – UPDATING THE CLASSICAL THREE-ARM MODEL


STEIN, Carol A.1, STEIN, Seth2, GALLAHUE, Molly M.2 and ELLING, Reece P.2, (1)Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, (2)Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-3130

In two classic papers, Burke and Dewey (1973) and Dewey and Burke (1974) proposed that continental rifting begins at hotspots - domal uplifts with associated magmatism - from which three rift arms extend. Rift arms from different hotspots link up to form new plate boundaries along which the continent breaks up, generating a new ocean basin and leaving failed arms termed aulacogens within the continent. In subsequent studies, hotspots became increasingly viewed as manifestations of deeper upwellings or plumes, which were the primary cause of continental rifting. We revisit this conceptual model and find that it remains useful, though some aspects require updates based on subsequent results. First, the rift arms are often boundaries of microplates accommodating motion between the major plates. Second, much of the magmatism associated with rifting is preserved either at depth, in underplated layers, and offshore. Third, many structures formed by the rifting survive at the resulting passive continental margins, so study of one can yield insight into the other. Fourth, hotspots play at most a secondary role in continental breakup, in that most of the associated volcanism reflects plate divergence, so three-arm junction points may not reflect localized upwelling.