THE ROCKS DON’T LIE, BUT PLUTONS SPEAK A LANGUAGE THAT IS EASY TO MISINTERPRET
Long-held but generally incorrect field interpretations that persist in the study of plutons include: that plutons are somehow born as km-scale magma bodies; that K-feldspar megacrysts grew early in an abundance of liquid; that intersecting modal layers form by erosional truncation; that crystals settle to the bottoms of magma chambers, pile up, and avalanche; that crystals are free to move independently of one another; that pluton floors are unseen, providing a convenient sewer system into which problems can be flushed; and so on. The rocks may seem to be saying these things, but they have been misunderstood, because most of these processes can be ruled out, or at least seriously questioned, by objective tests, application of results from phase equilibria, and impartial field observation.
Understanding what the rocks are saying requires recognition that their textures reflect long cooling histories spent largely under amphibolite and greenschist facies metamorphic conditions. Typically dismissed as “alteration”, the ubiquitous resetting of mineral compositions to lower-T (metamorphic) conditions is a fundamental process that also dramatically resets plutonic textures. Most plutonic rocks were contact-metamorphosed by heat and fluids from later increments. They have a lot to tell us, but we need to better learn their language.