THE UNDER-APPRECIATED ROLE OF ENRICHED MANTLE DURING GENESIS OF VARISCAN ULTRAPOTASSIC MAGMAS
Petrogenesis likely involved subduction of mature continental crust, which polluted the originally-depleted lithospheric mantle (Janoušek & Holub, 2007; Schulmann et al. 2014). Subsequently, heating, either by asthenospheric influx following slab break-off (Davies & von Blankenburg, 1995) or in-situ radiogenic decay (Lexa et al. 2011), led to partial melting of these metasomatized mantle domains. In the Bohemian Massif, these primary melts had more evolved Sr and Nd isotopic signatures than the crust of the upper plate with which they interacted. For example, this resulted in odd negative correlations of MgO content and initial εNd (increasing incorporation of crust led to less-crustal 87Sr/86Sr and εNd). Along the Vosges, a NE-SW gradient in 87Sr/86Sr and εNd in primitive magmas indicates variable degree of mantle contamination along dip of the subduction channel, possibly reflecting differences in age of the subducting crust (Tabaud et al. 2015).
Thus, gauging relative contributions of mantle and crust in potassic magmas of the Variscan Orogen (and possibly elsewhere) becomes highly dependent on which element or isotopic ratio is modeled (e.g. crustal recycling is underestimated if relying on mg# and mantle contribution is underestimated when considering Sr and Nd isotopes).