MINERAL-MELT EQUILIBRIUM MODELS VS BULK-ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY: WHICH TELLS THE TRUE STORY OF CORDILLERAN ARC FORMATION?
We conducted 1,207 geochemical analyses across 88 magmatic amphiboles in 25 samples (18 in Zealandia, 7 in the PRB), modeled the melts in equilibrium with these analyses, and compared them to bulk rock XRF data from the same samples. Amphiboles are mostly magnesiohornblende and all regions have average Si (apfu) identical within error (Zealandia: 6.84 ± 0.3; PRB: 7.08 ± 0.3). Molar Mg# (100*Mg/(Mg+Fe)) ranges from 40.1-74.7 in Zealandia and 40.7-52.4 in the PRB. Pressures from Al-in-hornblende barometry range from 0.2-6.1 kbar in Zealandia and 0.5-6.2 kbar in the PRB. Analyses within the calibration range of published melt models produce melts much more silicic (~65-85+ wt% SiO2) than their bulk-rock counterparts (~53-70 wt% SiO2). Modeled melts in equilibrium with our analyses display prominent negative Eu-anomalies, flat to spoon-shaped HREE patterns, average Dy/Yb < 3, and 68.7% (830/1,207) have Sr/Y < 40, consistent with the crystallization of plagioclase and amphibole. We suggest that the Sr/Y signature in bulk rocks is unrelated to melt compositions, but instead is a product of mineral accumulation. Our results indicate that high Sr/Y bulk-rocks are not representative of melts and elevated Sr/Y does not necessarily indicate the presence of a garnet-bearing root.