SEM ANALYSIS OF SILURIAN CLINTON IRONSTONE FROM BELL FURNACE, PENNSYLVANIA: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF MINERALIZATION AT A LEGACY JUNIATA IRON MINE SITE
Unfortunately, little is known about the legacy of Juniata Iron mine sites nor the impacts to soil/water quality in the region. This study is an initial investigation of iron ores from the BF site to better understand the mineralogy and potential for mobilization of metals from Silurian Clinton Group ironstones. Research by Matheson and Pufahl (2021) on Clinton ironstones from the NY type area suggests two ironstone types exist: granular ironstones composed of quartz-cored, iron-coated grains, and fossiliferous forms composed of carbonates coated by iron cements. Mineralogically, these are hematite (Fe2O3) and chamosite (Fe2+, Mg, Fe3+) 5 Al (Si3Al) O10 (OH, O)8. In our study, rock sections and SEM-EDS analysis reveal complex mineral associations with similarities and differences to the work of Matheson and Pufahl. Initial SEM-EDS analysis shows BF ironstones contain Fe-coated and inter-layered grains cored by both quartz and calcite as well as siderite (FeCO3), indicating mineralization during deposition of the grains. These mineral assemblages are stable in the weathering environment. However, our analyses reveal more diverse mineralogies exist as well. Dissolution of crinoid skeletal elements during diagenesis allowed for subsequent infilling and replacement of original material with a silvery mineral. Although SEM analyses are ongoing, the mineral is likely marcasite (FeS2), and as such, has the potential to generate acid rock drainage.