GSA Connects 2023 Meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Paper No. 57-4
Presentation Time: 2:20 PM

CENTENNIAL CAMBRIAN CONFUSION: WHAT IS BROOKSELLA ALTERNATA?


NOLAN, Morrison, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, 926 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, WALKER, Sally, Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, SELLY, Tara, Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, 101 Geology Building, Columbia, MO 65211-0001 and SCHIFFBAUER, James, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, 101 Geological Sciences Building, Columbia, MO 65211

First described as a medusoid jellyfish, the ‘‘star-shaped’’ Brooksella alternata from the Conasauga Formation Lagerstätten, Southeastern USA, was variously reconsidered as algae, feeding traces, gas bubbles, and most recently hexactinellid sponges. Here, we present morphological, chemical, and structural data to evaluate its hexactinellid affinities, as well as whether it could be a trace fossil or pseudofossil. External and cross-sectional surfaces, thin sections, X-ray computed tomography (CT) and micro-CT imaging, revealed no evidence that Brooksella is a hexactinellid sponge or a trace fossil. Although internally Brooksella contains abundant voids and variously orientated tubes consistent with multiple burrowing or bioeroding organisms, these structures have no relation to Brooksella’s external lobe-like morphology. Furthermore, Brooksella has no pattern of growth comparable to the linear growth of early Paleozoic hexactinellids; rather, its growth is similar to syndepositional concretions. Lastly, Brooksella, except for its lobes and occasional central depression, is no different in microstructure to the silica concretions of the Conasauga Formation, strongly indicating it is a morphologically unusual endmember of the silica concretions of the formation. These findings highlight the need for thorough and accurate descriptions in Cambrian paleontology; wherein care must be taken to examine the full range of biotic and abiotic hypotheses when assessing ambiguous material from that Period. This presentation is based on research presented in https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14796