GSA Connects 2023 Meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Paper No. 19-10
Presentation Time: 10:45 AM

REVISITING THE RETROARC FORELAND BASIN MODEL FOR THE ALTIPLANO BASIN


SAYLOR, Joel1, SUNDELL, Kurt E.2, PEREZ, Nicholas3, HENSLEY, Jeffrey B.4, MCCAIN, Payton5, RUNYON, Brook6, ALVAREZ, Paola7, CÁRDENAS, José8, USNAYO PERALES, Whitney P.8 and VALER, Carlos8, (1)Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2020 – 2207 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, CANADA, (2)Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Ave. Stop 8072, Pocatello, ID 83209, (3)Department of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, (4)Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Science and Research Building 1, 3507 Cullen Blvd, Rm 312, Houston, TX 77204, (5)Department of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, Halbouty Building, 3115 TAMU, 611 Ross St., College Station, TX 77843, (6)Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th St., Tucson, AZ 85721, (7)Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Campus Universitario Cota Cota, Calle 27, La Paz, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), (8)Escuela profesional de Ingenieria Geologica, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru

The Central Andean Plateau (CAP) is taller, wider, has thicker crust, and has greater retroarc shortening than anywhere else in the Andes. It also hosts some of the thickest Cenozoic strata in the Andes. Models proposed to account for the evolution of the Altiplano Basin include an eastward migrating fold-thrust belt and foreland basin, backarc extension, and a hinterland setting. Any of these could be modified by slab flattening or lithospheric delamination. However, the detailed, plateau-scale Cenozoic basin history needed to test proposed tectonic models has been unavailable. Here we synthesize new detrital zircon maximum depositional ages (MDAs), measured stratigraphic sections, and sediment provenance analysis of non-marine strata to develop a model of the Eocene–early Miocene evolution of the Altiplano-Puna plateau region. Stratigraphic sections show that the northernmost Altiplano records a classic foreland basin succession of depozones, while other sections along strike lack this diagnostic foreland basin signature. Stratigraphic correlations based on the new zircon MDAs show a Paleocene–Eocene unconformity/condensed section followed by resumption of rapid sediment accumulation. Rapid sediment accumulation resumed asynchronously from north to south: at 46–43 Ma at 15–16°S, at 36 Ma at 18°S, and as young 19 Ma at ~23°S. Provenance data indicate that Eastern Cordilleran detritus appeared in Altiplano strata at progressively younger ages to the south. The southward progression of this basin reorganization proceeded in lockstep with initiation of exhumation in the Eastern Cordillera, and also a lull in the magmatic arc followed by widespread volcanic flare-up. We present a model in which the observed stratigraphic patterns and hiatus, along with the magmatic lull and flare-up, orogenic widening, and high-magnitude shortening, are upper plate responses to shallowing and resteepening of a late Paleocene–early Miocene flat slab beneath the Altiplano-Puna plateau which drove a change from foreland to hinterland basin deposition, rather than the result of deposition from classic foreland basin. Hydration and weakening of the upper plate lithosphere facilitated later development of the suite of unique features which characterize the CAP.