GSA Connects 2023 Meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Paper No. 89-2
Presentation Time: 8:20 AM

SULFUR AND URANIUM MINERAL CHEMISTRY NETWORKS REVEAL DIVERGENT REDOX EVOLUTION


MOORE, Eli, Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, HAO, Jihua, 2Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Crust-Mantle Materials and Environments, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China, DIEDOLF, Joseph, Department of Environmental Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, MORRISON, Shaunna M., Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, HUMMER, Daniel, School of Earth Systems and Sustainability, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 1259 Lincoln Dr., Carbondale, IL 62901 and YEE, Nathan, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854

The redox sensitive elements sulfur (S) and uranium (U) reflect changing environmental conditions as well as having numerous mineral species in which the oxidation state is unknown. Uranium is an important energy resource while S is important in energy resource formation. Here, we use mineral chemistry network analysis and the weighted Mineral Element Electronegativity Coefficient of Variation (wMEECV) metric to investigate the interactions of mineral constituent elements within each mineral species and localities of S-containing minerals and U-containing minerals from the Mineral Evolution Database (MED). This analysis allows further understanding of mineral formation by inferring the redox state of S and U in minerals where it was previously unknown (SU, UU). Louvain community detection of the separate S and U mineral chemistry networks show that network communities are strongly influenced by redox state for both elements. The distribution of wMEECV values indicate that SU minerals typically contain reduced S (S2- or S22-), while UU minerals contain U6+. The predicted redox states of SU and UU indicate that the number of localities of reduced S minerals are underestimated, and the number of localities of oxidized U minerals are also underestimated. The wMEECV values of S6+ minerals and U6+ minerals expand through time, coinciding with atmospheric and lithospheric oxidation from the late Proterozoic to Phanerozoic. The relative abundance of oxidized U6+ mineral localities increased much later during the Phanerozoic than oxidized S6+ mineral localities, indicating that S6+ was generated from oxidative weathering prior to U6+ partly because of the higher redox potential of the U6+/U4+ pair versus the S6+/S2- pair. The late oxidation and formation of U6+ minerals illustrates the importance of land plant evolution and redox-controlled U deposition from ground water in continental sediments. While U deposition was impacted by organic matter, the prevalence S2- deposition played an important role in organic matter diagenesis during the Phanerozoic.