GSA Connects 2023 Meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Paper No. 9-2
Presentation Time: 8:20 AM

CHANGING SEAWATER CARBON ISOTOPE COMPOSITIONS AT THE EDIACARAN-CAMBRIAN BOUNDARY PRESERVED DUE TO EARLY MARINE DIAGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN LAURENTIA


LONSDALE, Mary1, AHM, Anne-Sofie C.2, NELSON, Lyle L.3, THOMPSON, Jacob W.4, HIGGINS, John A.5 and SMITH, Emily F.1, (1)Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, (2)Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada, (3)Earth and Planetary Sciences, Carleton University, 2201 Herzberg Laboratories, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada, (4)Baltimore Polytechnic High School, Baltimore, MD 21209, (5)Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

A negative carbon isotope excursion is recognized among Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary strata from the western margin of Laurentia. While this excursion, termed the BAsal Cambrian carbon isotope Excursion (BACE), is not precisely biostratigraphically constrained to the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary outside of Laurentia, it has been used globally to correlate strata, construct age models, and interpret environmental change during a critical interval in the evolutionary history of animals. Here, we assess the diagenetic history of the BACE in southwestern Laurentia to evaluate the traditional interpretation of the BACE as a record of perturbation to seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) values.

We present data from three stratigraphic sections in Nevada, California, and Mexico, where the BACE has previously been recognized in Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary strata. We compare carbon isotope (δ13C) records from these sections with stable isotope (δ44/40Ca, δ26Mg) and elemental (Sr/[Ca+Mg]) records, which we interpret as proxies for early marine diagenesis. We find that δ13C and δ44/40Ca values do not covary across all sections, but that each section predominantly preserves seawater-buffered δ13C and δ44/40Ca records. From these results, we interpret the BACE not as a product of early marine diagenesis, but as a record of changing DIC δ13C values during early marine diagenesis. We note that the most negative δ13C values preserved are among the most extensively seawater-buffered and suggest that a seawater-buffered δ13C record is more reflective of ancient DIC δ13C compositions than a sediment-buffered δ13C record.