CRUSTAL GROWTH MODELS AND PALEOMAGNETIC METHODS FOR DEEP-TIME (ARCHEAN-PROTEROZOIC) CRATONIC RECONSTRUCTIONS
Reconstructions based on paleomagnetic data are hampered by the freedom of paleolongitude that arises from symmetry of Earth’s time-averaged magnetic field about its spin axis. In an effort to reconfigure ancient supercontinental landmasses, many paleomagnetists have utilized such paleolongitudinal freedom to follow a “closest-approach” method of cratonic juxtapositions, leaving no empty spaces between the continental blocks. This method results in ancient supercontinents substantially smaller than Pangea, surrounded by an equally larger oceanic tract than Panthalassa; it would be consistent with models of continuous continental growth. If paleomagnetic data allow for matching of apparent polar wander path segments during supercontinental tenure, however, then cratons can be arranged in both relative paleolatitude and paleolongitude; such a method would permit quantifiable separations between cratons within supercontinental assemblages. Those “holes” could have been filled by oceanic lithosphere in remnant basins like today’s Black Sea, or they may have been filled by continental lithosphere that subsequently recycled into the mantle. As such, the latter method can accommodate the Armstrong model of near-constant continental inventory through the past few billion years.