GSA Connects 2023 Meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Paper No. 129-10
Presentation Time: 4:05 PM

BARIUM ISOTOPE CHARACTERIZATION OF HANOVER SHALE CARBONATE AND BARITE NODULES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POST-DEPOSITIONAL FLUID FLOW IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN


MATECHA, Rebecca1, STEWART, Brian2 and CAPO, Rosemary C.2, (1)Department of Geology and Environmental Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; Department of Earth Sciences, College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691, (2)Department of Geology and Environmental Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260

Calcium carbonate and barite (BaSO4) nodules in Upper Devonian marine shales of the Hanover Formation in the Appalachian Basin, USA, record multiple changes in fluid rock interaction at the sulfate methane transition zone (SMTZ). Barite and carbonate nodules of the Hanover Shale were collected from an outcrop in western NY representing an approximate stratigraphic range of 3m. Petrographic analysis of barite nodules showed “featherlike” barite (~10 mm) radiating from a core of euhedral barite crystals. Barite rims (2-12 mm thick) encasing carbonate nodules transitioned from euhedral barite near the barite-carbonate contact to a more radial barite near the outer edge of the rim. This textural change could reflect an increase in barite supersaturation from increased sulfate or Ba concentration [Shikazono, N. 1994, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 58, 2203-2213]. Barium isotope analysis was conducted on crushed carbonate nodules, barite rims on carbonate nodules, and barite nodules. δ138Ba values (138Ba/134Ba normalized to NIST standard 3104a) for the carbonate nodules ranged from 0.32‰ to 0.74‰ with no obvious trends vertically along the section or correlated with Ba concentration. δ138Ba values for the barite nodules ranged from 0.20‰ to 0.63‰ with a general increase in δ138Ba with stratigraphic height. Within one barite nodule, the center crystals had a δ138Ba value of 0.20‰ and the radial rim was 0.32‰ which is consistent with closed-system fractionation of the source fluid due to barite precipitation. Barite rims which encased carbonate nodules ranged from 0.37‰ to 0.44‰, distinct from the carbonate cores. Variability of δ138Ba values across barite and carbonate samples suggests carbonate and barite precipitation occurred at different times and also suggest that the δ138Ba composition of the fluid changed between precipitation of each horizon. Changes in barite morphology and δ138Ba values suggest that a source of Ba rich fluid was introduced episodically, possibly alongside upward diffusing methane sourced from underlying Devonian to Ordovician shales such as the Marcellus or Utica Shales, which led to movement of the SMTZ and the formation and preservation of the barite.