GEOCHEMICAL TRENDS OF BERYL TRACE ELEMENTS: EXPECTATIONS MET AND UNMET
Beryl can be separated structurally or by color (thus chromophores) – these are often complementary features. Structurally, beryl has two dominant drivers: substitutions occurring at the octahedral Al-site, or substitutions occurring at the tetrahedral Be-site. The simplest visual criteria for beryl classification/separation are by its color, largely corresponding to its gemstone varieties. Considering the structural and color driven groups together, four broad practical groupings emerge: emeralds, non-emerald octahedral type substitution dominant beryl (aquamarine, heliodor, green beryl), Li-driven beryl (goshenite and morganite), and a natural kind subset of non-emerald octahedral type substitutions: red beryl.
We evaluate beryl as a geochemical tracer of petrogenetic processes and gain understanding of how geographic origin determination can be conducted for gem specimens beyond the current economic deposits of emerald. We use a data-driven approach, with thousands of new LA-ICP-MS analyses acquired from hundreds of samples, to ensure we represent the widest range of chemistry yet known in natural beryl. Classical geochemical approaches, statistical analyses, and machine learning reveal new compositional trends in beryl according to their classifications, verify or defy current expectations, and demonstrate that beryl is a tracer mineral in broader geologic research involving fractionated environments.